Thunderbolts of the Gods | Official Movie

Thunderbolts of the Gods | Official Movie
Articles
100


The Earth was once the
center of the universe. It was flat. Then it was round and it circled the Sun. It was no longer the
center of the universe. It was a tiny part
of the Milky Way. The Milky Way was
the only Galaxy. Except it wasn’t. It was only one of billions of galaxies
floating in space without end. Every single time we think we
have got it all figured out, we realize we have merely found
another piece of the picture. It is a big picture with many pieces. Sir Isaac Newton was the first
to state the Law of Gravity. Eventually everybody agreed that
gravity alone formed galaxies and that stars and planets and gravity
alone holds the universe together. Then we discovered a force a 1000 billion billion billion billion times more
powerful than the gravity. Until recently we believed that the space
between the stars and planets was empty – a vacuum. We now know it is teaming
with charged particles. We see glowing electric filaments
spanning millions of light years. We see stellar and galactic
formations shaped by magnetic fields. Only electric currents
create magnetic fields. It is possible that the predominant
force in the universe is not gravity but something else. Recent discoveries in space have
amazed and perplexed astronomers. Currently popular theories in the
sciences can neither predict nor explain the phenomena
we are now observing. A new theory is being proposed,
a theory which can both, predict and explain the data
coming back from deep space. Its implications are profound and
affect all scientific disciplines. It is in fact a synthesis
of the disciplines, a synthesis which has already
led to discoveries that link modern astronomy, leading edge plasma
physics and ancient mythology. The electric model offers us a new
interpretation of the workings of the universe, the history of our solar system
and even human history. Myth & Science The rise of science was a
triumph over mythology, over magic and superstition. That’s why the word science
today implies reliability. The word myth means
fiction, not true and it turns out that the key
to understanding the myth is the same key that is now helping us
to understand objects in deep space, to understand the workings
of the physical universe. That key is electricity. It was 33 years ago that I
first began to wonder about these preposterous stories told around the
world, what we call world mythology. What was it that provoked this incredible
outpouring of human imagination just a few thousand years ago, just before
the birth of the first civilizations? I came to a radical conclusion that the myth
arose from extraordinary natural events. Our early ancestors witnessed things
in the sky that are not seen today. The events were awe-inspiring,
both beautiful and terrifying. So it shouldn’t surprise us that
the myth so incomprehensible Well, of course, they’re incomprehensible. The celestial references
are no longer present. It was in 1994 that I was invited to
come to the US to attend a conference, which was dealing with the
possibility that the ancient sky as witnessed by our earliest forebearers
was different to the one we see today. I’ve been interested in
this kind of idea because it could only be explained in terms of electromagnetic
influences within the solar system. So, it came as a bit of a shock and
as a surprise to see David Talbott showing slides at one of the
sessions of the conference, which I recognized
immediately as being similar to those of electric
discharges in the laboratory. It was wonderful for me personally
to come to my first Kronia meeting and hear David Talbott. And I still want to
see some of those slides that he showed again and again and again. That explained the white crown of Egypt and
the rest of these things that he showed us all from mythology all from
thousands of years ago. These things clearly were seen by civilizations
that never talked to each other from the far corners
of the Earth. It all just click together like a
three-dimensional jigsaw puzzles in my mind. Unity of Myth A breakthrough for me
came when I realized that many different
cultures spread around the world used different words, different
symbols, different myths to describe precisely the
same formations in the sky. The ouroboros or celestial serpent
biting its tail for example occurs on every
habitable continent but it has no ties to the
world we now observe. Like all of the archetypes,
it is part of an alien sky: a cosmic column rising to the center of the
sky, holding aloft the wheel of heaven and much more than a wheel because
this was the revolving cosmic temple, the city of the gods,
the kingdom of heaven, always resting on
the cosmic column. Then there is the image of the
four rivers or pathways radiating from the
center of the sky out to the boundary,
the rim of the wheel. The simplest forms lead you invariably
to the full story of world mythology. The hero’s journey unfolds as
the story of the wheel’s axle. The mother goddess
finds her identity in the star at the summit, the
hub and spokes of the wheel. The Key From childhood on, I’ve always had
a deep interest in mythology and I remember that
as a child I was trying to draw up genealogies of the
gods as provided in greek mythology and I soon found out
that it didn’t work nor did anything else in
mythology seem to work. There was no singular fitting explanation
that would make sense of these stories. So, I basically laid this whole subject to
rest, and I didn’t look at it for many years until I came across the work by Dave
Talbott and Everett Cochrane mainly whose articles were
real eye-opener for me and as soon as I began to read these articles it became clear to me that we
were really looking here at a very important key to
the unlocking of myth. And the recent findings provided
by plasma physics are capable of providing that key. Based on the results we have seen so
far and Dr Peratt’s investigations with petroglyphs,
which he matches successfully to laboratory experiments
involving plasma, it has now become crystal clear
and I think undeniable that the morphology of plasma
as it manifests itself, both in the laboratory
and in space, can account successfully for
the major themes in mythology. To find the true meaning of the myths,
we follow a forensic approach. The purpose is to expose the points of
agreement between the different cultures because here at the level
of the archetypes everything is unified. There are no isolated themes of myth
at the level of the substructure. This is like a holograph, follow one
archetype and its links to other archetypes, and you’ll find one story
told around the world. PLASMA The Fundamental State of Matter Throughout almost all of history we
have regarded the states of matter as being solid, liquid or gas. But in
the last century or so, we have found that there is a form of
matter where the charged particles within atoms are separated to some degree or
another and that is known as a plasma. It is the fundamental
state of matter. It was not until the second
half of the 20th-century that we came to realize the
role of plasma in the universe, and this has changed the
picture of space completely. Not long ago we thought of the
physical universe as being constituted fundamentally of nothing more
than atoms and empty space. But a plasma includes at least a
percentage of charged particles, protons and electrons, that are
not bound to any atomic structure, and plasma is an
excellent conductor. Electrons will move efficiently in
the direction of charge equalization, and that is an electric
current of course. Now the reason why we see magnetic
fields everywhere we look in space is because electric currents
produce magnetic fields and only electric currents
produce magnetic fields. But astronomers working only
with gravitational equations did not anticipate the discovery of
pervasive magnetic fields in deep space. Electric currents also account for the
abundant filamentation of space plasma. First the electric currents
produce the magnetic fields then these fields confine the
electron flow to narrow paths. Such currents paths are filaments
called Birkeland currents, named after the pioneer,
Kristian Birkeland. They are typically braided
just like the twisted wires of transmission lines on Earth. Well, that’s their role in space: to conduct
electricity across vast distances, creating the astonishing structures
we observe in every direction. None of these structures were
anticipated by gravitational theory, and none are indicated by the behavior
of neutral gases in a vacuum. In any theory of the universe,
plasma is extremely important because it has been found since
the space age that it makes up 99.99 percent of the
visible universe. So our inexperience with it on
the Earth’s surface is rather crippling when it comes
to trying to decide on a cosmology to explain
the visible universe. Now, plasma behaves rather oddly
compared to normal matter, the matter we find as solids,
liquids and gases on Earth. If we look at a
novelty plasma ball, you will see that it forms these bright
filaments that dart all around inside the globe. And if you look closely at them, you’ll see they are
actually twin filaments twisted together. In other words nature
finds it efficient to be able to transfer energy
over a distance by twisting two pairs
of filaments together, and this is a characteristic of the way
plasma carries electric currents in space. And one of the puzzles that has faced
astronomers since the space age is the discovery of
filamentary structures in galaxies, around stars, even the cometary tails of
planets and comets themselves. These filamentary structures
have come as a surprise. Plasma is Scalable We now have plasma physicists
who are doing important experiments in laboratories around the world. And one of the virtues
of plasma experiments is that they can be scaled over an
enormous numbers of magnitudes. In other words, a discharge phenomenon
that may be seen in the laboratory that occupies only a few centimeters can
be scaled up to the size of a galaxy and you will see the
same structures. Now, this introduces a new area into cosmology
where we can do experiments on Earth, which can verify our ideas or theories
about how the rest of the universe works. Similar Patterns
in the Lab and in the Sky Some of the natural consequences
of electric cosmology are the patterns that we see, both in
the laboratory and in the sky. A very good example of this is
the work of Dr Anthony Peratt, who was a graduate student of
the very famous Hannes Alfvén, who was really the father
of electric cosmology. Peratt simulated on a super computer
using just a cloud of electrical charges and a magnetic field just using
the laws of electrical science, not using anything
to do with gravity. He simulated what looked
like a spiral galaxy. And the interesting thing is that
Peratt’s spiral galaxy in the laboratory had exactly the same
rotational properties as the real spiral galaxies
that we see in the sky. Plasma, Gods & Monsters Plasma was named by Irving Langmuir
because of its life-like qualities. In other words, the
similarity to blood plasma gave rise to the term “plasma” now used
in the sciences. Well, this has incredible meaning for us
because of the nature of the metamorphosing. The god, who is now an eagle,
now a serpent or dragon, now a leonine figure
with long flowing hair. These figures take on
a whole new meaning when we can interpret them with
the benefit of plasma science. Cosmology The new instrumentation that
was developed in the space age expanded our ability to perceive
things, perceive facts. We can now see things in the
entire electromagnetic spectrum instead of just the narrow
sliver of visible light. And we had sensors that
were out in space. We were freed from the geocentric
and anthropocentric order that had prevailed before. We’ve got a whole new universe, and
theoreticians are still trying to look at it through [a friend of mine says they’re
peering through] the wrong end of the telescope [and trying] and telling
us what they imagine they see. The Disconnected View Modern cosmology gives us a rather
disconnected view of the universe. In other words, we are separated
star from star by vast distances. Light takes a long time to travel between
stars and across galaxies, and, therefore, we look upon ourselves
as isolated and disconnected. The Electric Universe
takes a different view. It says that we are part of the sun’s
environment, electrical environment, and the sun is a part of
the galactic environment and the galaxy itself is
strung like all galaxies on huge electric currents
flowing through the universe. Electricity in Space? One of the typical questions that plasma
cosmologists hear all the time is: How do you know what’s
out there in space? How do you know there’s
electricity out there in space? Is there energy out
there in space? Why should we consider
anything more than gravity? And the answer is that through the years we’ve
used optical telescopes but recently we have what
are called radio telescopes and we’ve broadened the spectrum
that we can look at the sky with. And those radio
telescopes can measure electric currents and
magnetic fields and we can determine from those measurements
the strength of the electric currents, the strength of the
forces involved and the amount of energy that’s stored out there in space. Relativity & Quantum Physics The two major pillars of
modern cosmology are based on the theories of relativity
and Quantum Theory and as Einstein himself noted
the two are incompatible. And that is maybe because the theories
of relativity deal with matter as if it’s only consequence
is the bending of space. The Electric Universe, on the other hand, deals
with the electrical structure of matter at the subatomic level then
works its way up through living systems if you like, planets, stars, galaxies
and the entire universe and shows that it is the
electrical structure of matter that forms the amazing
shapes we see in deep space. Magnetic Fields We can demonstrate the existence
of these currents flowing between galaxies
and between stars by the presence of the
magnetic fields they generate. Magnetic fields are threaded through space
at all dimensions, within the solar system, on the surface of the
sun, between stars, and within galaxies and
even between galaxies. Now magnetic field can only be
generated by electric currents. So, in other words, to continue that
magnetic field for any length of time requires that there be electrical power
input into those magnetic fields. And that raises the
whole question: Where does this power come from? The Mathematical Cosmology Modern cosmology is
highly mathematical. In fact, we were joking
before about the idea that the only people who understand cosmology
are professional cosmologists. The basis of cosmology
really if you hunt for it lies in Einsteinian
relativistic mechanics and, when Einstein
promulgated his ideas, he totally and completely
ignored anything electrical. And so the modern cosmology
with all of its ideas of Omega and expanding universe and
inflation theory and the Big Bang and all the rest of it are
predicated on a foundation which ignores almost half of man’s knowledge
about the way the universe works, which is electricity. It may sound like I am dismissing Einstein
and his theories of relativity out of hand but we have to give
Einstein credit for his integrity in pointing out that his theory
did not meet his requirements, and that is that his theory had to be
tied back to some form of reality. And there is no explanation as
to why matter should curve space to give the effect of gravity. He felt that quantum theory
being a probabilistic theory divorced cause and effect. And this is one of the things
you can not do in physics, is divorce cause and effect, otherwise you
might as well give up and get a real job. But this is a puzzle that dogged
Einstein through his later years to the point that his
followers tended to go off and use his geometrical explanations
to conjure up things like black holes and neutron
stars and so on and the expansion of
the universe and the Big Bang without referring back to Einstein,
who with great integrity said he wasn’t satisfied
with his explanation. Black Holes One of the problems faced by
astronomers, after the space age began, was to explain the discovery
of very concentrated outbursts of energy
in deep space. And that meant for them, since gravity is
the only driving force available to them, that they require an infinite
concentration of mass because gravity is an
infinitely weak force. The black hole as Wheeler originally
visualized it sucked everything, including light, in and so
therefore was invisible. So, he could postulate its
existence, and we couldn’t see it. And because we couldn’t see it, we
couldn’t prove that it wasn’t there. Later on, in order to explain these fantastic
emissions of energy from galaxies, it was proposed, and I believe it was
Stephen Hawking who did it, that there were various
types of black holes, some of which actually then spat
matter back out again in jets because why, because
we had observed jets. In the electrical model, it’s quite
simple if you think about it. The power that’s expressed
in your own home in the heaters and the electric
motors and the lighting and so on is actually generated at a vast
distance away from your house. In deep space the
same thing is true. The energy, which we see
concentrated in these events, which are attributed
to black holes and so, can more easily be explained as
the confluence of electric energy from different parts
of the same galaxy or even from other
parts of the universe. And it is this explosive release of energy
which forms the vast jets that we see lit up and exploding from the
centers of active galaxies. We also have observed double radio
sources either side of galaxies and that event was
predicted by Hannes Alfvén the founding father of
modern electrical cosmology and is still to this day
unexplained by standard cosmology. The Pulsar One interesting phenomenon in the
sky is the so-called Pulsar. The pulsar is an object, that
is observed to put out pulses, both of light and radio activity in
the RF [radio frequency] spectrum, and those pulses are
extremely rapid. They are something like
milliseconds apart. So, it’s like an extremely
fast strobe light. And, thinking this of a strobe
light, astronomers immediately leapt to the lighthouse
kind of analogy. Something must be spinning
around, a beam was going around, and its going around so quickly that
this thing goes flash, flash, flash. Well, once the repetition rate
of the pulsars was observed to get up to in the millisecond
range that meant that this star that was putting out this beam
of radiation would have had to be rotating at three
hundred times a second. And three hundred times a second, we’re talking
about the speed of a dentist’s drill. So, the astronomers decided, well, normal
stars couldn’t possibly rotate at that speed and so they postulated the existence
of what they called a neutron star. A neutron star is a star that is so
dense that it holds together so well, that it can, indeed, rotate at
the speed of a dentist’s drill. Well, the problem is that in
nuclear chemistry we know that you can’t pack neutrons
together that densely. They will all fly apart
instantaneously. There is a [thing] a principle called the
Island of Stability in nuclear chemistry that absolutely prevents that. So, here again we have the standard
astronomers or astrophysicists going directly against another
well-developed science. In the electrical model, however, there
is a very simple explanation for pulsars. Everybody is familiar
with the idea that pulses can travel back and forth on
electrical transmission lines. Such uncontrolled pulses for
example were responsible for the famous northeast black outs. A similar effect can occur between two
binary stars connected by a plasma. The two binary stars act like
capacitors that store charge. And if you reduce that in size to something
you can produce in the laboratory, you can produce it in the laboratory,
and it’s called relaxation oscillator. Electrical engineers use it,
and have used it, for decades. The idea of producing pulses
every few milliseconds is a sophomore level of experiment in
electrical engineering laboratory. It doesn’t require neutronium, strange
matter or any other fictitious device. All it requires is two capacitors, a
battery and and a nonlinear resistor. And we maintain that’s exactly what
a binary pair of stars connected by a plasma field presents. Magnetic Force
vs.
Gravitational Force A typical ion in the solar
wind hydrogen nucleus moving about 20 km per
second, which is relatively slow for the ions in solar wind, in
the magnetic field of the sun experiences potentially magnetic forces
that are something like 10 million times the strength of the gravitational
force on that same ion from the sun. An interesting demonstration that illustrates
very readily the relative strength of magnetic force and
gravitational force is the simple idea of a ball
bearing sitting on a wooden table. The entire mass of the Earth is pulling
downward on that little ball bearing, and that’s what prevents it
from flying out into the space. But a child can come along with
a little horseshoe magnet, and click, can pick that
ball bearing up instantly. The space age presents us
with an interesting paradox. That technology of science is
really quite extraordinary. And technology has taken us out
into space, taken us to the Moon, taken probes to distant planets, opened
up whole new vistas in remote space with new telescopes and new ways of
measuring what’s happening in space. But the picture of theoretical
sciences is much different. And many decades ago, assumptions began
to crystallize in the theoretical sciences, beginning at the top, that the queen of the
sciences, as we say, which is cosmology. These theoretical assumptions have constrained
all of the other theoretical sciences. Cosmology deals with the big picture
questions, the first questions. How did the universe begin? What is it made of? How will it end? And so many popular theoretical constructs
from the big bang to string theory, to dark matter and black holes, the
formation of stars, formation of galaxies, all have arisen from assumptions
first postulated by cosmologists. At the same time these assumptions
have defined boundaries for other theoretical sciences, working
down from astronomy and astrophysics to the space sciences, solar theory,
even Earth history, even human history, have all been confined
by these boundaries established by the
queen of the sciences: cosmology. Sun The sun just dominates our sky as the source of light and
warmth and life itself on Earth. This preeminence of the sun is so clear
and obvious that it remains a mystery why virtually every ancient
culture insisted that before the present sun there was a quite
different luminary ruling the sky. The central sun, the superior sun,
the best sun, the motionless sun. And all of these cultures, whatever may
be the meaning of these traditions, are insisting that
the sky has changed. Of course, our ideas about the
sun have continually changed. Only a few centuries ago the sun
was a campfire or ember in the sky. Then early in the 20th-century, under
the influence of gravitational theory, the sun was seen as a gravitationally
collapsing nebular cloud. In the atomic age, astronomers
began to visualize the sun in terms of a nuclear
furnace hidden at its core. But now we are in the
age of plasma science. With discoveries of the
electric currents in space, and it’s inconceivable
that these discoveries would not change the
picture of the sun again. An Electric Phenomenon Plasma cosmologists have been able
to demonstrate experimentally and also in a supercomputer that
galaxies are an electrical phenomenon. Which raises the question about stars
and in particular our own sun, which is the closest star
to the Earth, of course. Any theory of the Sun has to explain how
it could continue to burn for billions of years and also explain its present
size based on its known mass. And of course, as soon as
nuclear energy was discovered, it was grasped immediately as
the energy source of the Sun. But all of that assumes that the Sun is
disconnected and an isolated body, and that it must consume
itself over its lifetime to provide the heat and life
that we receive from it. But if the Sun is connected to the rest
of the galaxy in an electrical sense, it doesn’t require to
burn itself at all. And the energy that we receive is
actually being received from the galaxy, and the sun is acting as
a focus for that energy. The Sun is actually a
fairly typical star. And so, if we want to
understand stars and cosmology, we really
have to understand the Sun. And the Standard Model
of the Sun, so-called, that astronomers are so
very proud of these days, really doesn’t explain
very much about the Sun. Why is there a corona
in the first place? Everybody knows about the corona, the
beautiful corona that we see during solar eclipses. Why is it there? It is clearly
an electrical phenomenon. Coronal Heating One of the greatest
puzzles about the Sun has been: with the surface temperature
of six thousand degrees [Fahrenheit], high above that surface we have
temperatures of millions of degrees. And the question has been: How do we get the energy from the center
of the Sun somehow past that surface to heat the upper atmosphere of
the Sun to millions of degrees? In an electric model you
don’t have that problem because if the energy is
arriving from outside the Sun, the first place you expect to
see that energy expressed is above the Sun and its
tenuous atmosphere. And that is the place where
particle acceleration occurs, and the apparent temperature
goes very high indeed, often into the
millions of degrees. Solar Wind The fact that the particles
in the solar wind accelerate, that is to say increase their velocity with
increasing distance away from the Sun. The farther away they
get the faster they go. And the fact those particles are
indeed charged particles, leads me as an electrical engineer
to come to the immediate conclusion that this is an
electrical process. In the Solar Model, think of the
Sun as being a positive anode, a very high voltage body that obviously
would emanate an electric field. And if you put a charged particle in
an electric field it will accelerate. That’s the way we accelerate
particles here on Earth. It’s the way every physicist
and electro-dynamicist has ever increased the velocity
of a charged particle, is put it in an electric field. Sunspots One of the features we observe on the
Sun, which have no business being there according to the Standard
Model, are sunspots. The most significant
thing about a sunspot is the fact that the center
of a sunspot is dark. And if the Sun is trying
to radiate energy from its core into space, we should expect
that it is bright. And if you think about that umbra, the
darkest place in the center of sunspots, that’s the place where we can
see deepest into the Sun. And just consider the fact that, at
that point where we can really see down into the Sun, that’s the absolute
coldest place that we are able to measure. If the center of the Sun is
really a nuclear fusion furnace, it should be the hottest because
we’re closest to the source. And it’s not the case. We ask any astronomer,
why are there sunspots? Why are the umbra dark? They would blame it on some sort
of warp-twisted magnetic fields. They will say that it has to
do with the solar dynamo. All of which lurk unseen like a big
genie somewhere below the surface. These phenomena are only to be expected
if the Sun is electrical in nature. Fusion Model Astrophysicists make the claim
that the Solar Fusion Model has indeed been tested
in a laboratory. And nothing really is
further from the truth. Although each of the steps involved
in the hydrogen to helium fusion reaction have indeed been verified
experimentally, the overall experiment, the overall reaction has never been produced
in a continuous laboratory experiment. Continuous Hydrogen to Helium fusion
has not been attained in the lab. The strength in fact of the
electric cosmology is that indeed all of the mechanisms that the
electrical people talk about have been verified over decades, in fact
at least a century in the laboratory. The plasma scaling is well-known and
plasma and electrical experiments have verified every
step of the way. Fusion Model,
No Explanations There are any number of observations
that have ad hoc present explanations, but really have no explanation
in the Standard Model and are natural consequences
of the electrical model. For example, heavy elements, the solar
spectrum, the neutrino deficiency, the neutrino variability, solar atmosphere,
differential rotation by latitude, differential rotation by depth,
equatorial plasma torus, sunspots, sunspot migration, the sunspot
penumbra and the sunspot cycle itself, magnetic field strength, the even
magnetic field, helio seismology, solar density and
the changing size. All of the observations
in that list are natural consequences of
the Electrical Sun Model. Standard astronomers tend to pass them off
as being inconsequential difficulties that will eventually
someday be solved. I maintain, and so do our colleagues
here, that these are not inconsequential but are rather death blows to the Solar
Fusion Model because they are important. They’re not secondary. They are primary falsifying observations
for that failed nuclear fusion model. What I find so fascinating about
the electric model of the Sun is not just that it is a challenge
to a long-standing theory but that it opens the door to the
ancient world, to an electric sky. The electromagnetic phenomenon that we
now observe on the surface of the Sun and in the vicinity of the Sun are direct
pointers backwards to the plasma formations that were seen above the
ancient sky worshipers. Comet Electric Currents in Space Electrical currents in space can either
be invisible or they can be visible. If they are very
diffuse, in other words, if there is very little energy per
cubic meter, they will be invisible. But where that energy becomes
concentrated, it will begin to glow. And we see this kind of thing in the
ion tails of comets, for instance. Where the energy becomes very
concentrated, we begin to see arcs and sparks, if you like,
electrical discharge phenomena. Standard Theory of Comets The Standard Theory of comets
comes from the view that the solar system was formed from
a rotating cloud of gas and dust and that the planets, in some
fashion as yet unexplained, completely formed from most of that gas
and dust but there were leftovers. And the leftovers are beyond sight
outside the solar system in a hypothetical Oort
cloud, as it’s called. We have no observational
evidence for such a cloud. The Electric Universe Model of comets
is that they are actually parts of well-differentiated
planetary bodies that have in the past suffered from
electrical plasma discharge machining, and that some of the surface
material has been lofted into space. So, it is expected to be rocky. The second thing is that because
comets trace an elongated orbit, both away from the Sun
and toward the Sun, in that trajectory its charge
changes, its voltage changes. Since it spends most of its
time in the outer solar system, the voltage that it has reflects the
voltage in the outer solar system. But as it hurtles towards the Sun,
as it enters toward the Earth orbit, the voltage is changing rapidly and
the comet has to respond to that by beginning to discharge and
that’s where we see the familiar cometary phenomena of the coma
and the various tails that it produces. This creates a very distinct
difference between the two models, the Standard Model of a comet, which is
supposed to be a dust and ice leftover from the formation of the solar
system, and the Electrical Model, which says that a comet
is an electrical body, which begins to discharge as it
enters the inner solar system. Comet ‘Jets’ Ever since we began to
look at comets in close-up, and Halley was the first one that was
observed by several spacecraft close-up, it was found to astronomer’s surprise
that the material coming off the comet was coming in discrete jets
and seemed to be coming from what looked like
circular areas on the crater. But the imagry wasn’t
sufficiently sharp to be able to tell exactly
what was going on. This required the Standard Model
to come up with an idea that maybe the surface of the comet is
coated in black tarry substance or something which was
preventing the material from just evaporating
from the surface and forming jets as it
burst through the surface. But when later images were looked
at as we passed other comets, it was found to the astronomers amazement
that they were seeing very sharp relief. It was
not like a melted ice cream, it was looking like a piece
of heavily cratered rock. Now this fits the Electric Model of the
electrical discharge birth of such a body. In other words, there is rather no
distinction between an asteroid and a comet other
than its orbit. Comet Tempel One It was in this context that I
looked at Comet Tempel 1, which was chosen as the
target for an impact. The idea was that the impact
would create a small crater, which could then be photographed by the
passing spacecraft and we can determine whether the material was ice or dust or rock
based on the size of the impact crater. It seemed to me that, if this comet
was a charged body, there would be several other effects that
were unexpected. Principally as a metal copper
object approached the comet, there should be an electric discharge
to that copper projectile. In other words, there will be an initial flash
and then there would be the impact itself. And the impact, I suggested, would be
far more energetic than was expected because it would tend to concentrate the
electrical discharge in the area of the impact and also it may change the
nature of the jets nearby. So, it was with great interest that
I waited the results of the impact and watched that on television. Before the impact, the astronomers
in the assembled control room were worried that they
wouldn’t see anything, that the impact would
result in a very small puff of dust and that would
be the end of it. So, when the impact occurred, they
were surprised by two things. One was that there was
an initial flash followed by the main
impact which was so energetic that some of the sensors were almost
swamped and the passing spacecraft was unable to achieve it’s primary aim,
which was to photograph the crater. Comet Tempel One
Finely Divided Dust Apart from the surprising brightness
of the dust released from the impact with Comet Tempel 1 was due to the fact that
it was so intense and so wide-spread and one of the initial findings was that
it seems to be very finely divided dust. Now this is the same thing that
was found at Comet Halley, and it was a surprise then. So, it’s rather surprising that
they were surprised once more. The point is that an electrical discharge
on a surface will release material, dusty material, very
finely divided. It’s a technique that’s
used in sputtering of metals on to, for instance,
astronomical mirrors. So this production of very fine dust is
to be expected in the Electrical Model. But in the Standard Model you are asking
ices to evaporate or to sublimate and in doing so to
drive off pre-existing dust grains. So there is no way that the
dust can be finely divided; it will be in its
pristine state. So, the production of this
great cloud of very fine dust is rather inexplicable
in the Standard Model. Comets
&
Electromagnetic Forces The Electrical Model of comets
was driven for several people by Velikovsky’s challenge
that the solar system had electromagnetic forces
to be taken into account. One of the early pioneers
in addressing this issue of comets and electrical
phenomenon was Ralph Juergens. When he proposed the
electrical model of the Sun, it implied that all bodies in the
solar system must have to some degree a cometary appearance or a cometary
effect associated with them. Electric Forces Induce
Cometary Display Ralph Juergens in his
model of the Sun showed that bodies moving radially
toward or away from the Sun would experience electrical
forces which could induce a cometary display,
as a visible display. Also working in late years with
Ralph Juergens was Dr Earl Milton, and he made some
predictions and statements about the impact of Comet Shoemaker-Levy
9 fragments with Jupiter. And his view of the electrical nature
of those impacts was also vindicated. Venus with Comet Tail In the Electrical Model
of the solar system any body moving away from or
toward the Sun at any great rate, for example like a comet, will
experience electrical effects, which result in a cometary appearance,
and that can apply to a planet. Now Velikovsky in his
research found that Venus was described as a stupendous
comet at some point in ancient times. So, it was very gratifying for him to be
able to announce at a conference in 1974 that astronomers had discovered what
they called a cometary tail of Venus. Some years later it
was announced that it was discovered that stringy
things were coming from Venus and, of course, this was
confirmation to the Electrical Model because plasma currents
flow in strings. This discovery of a cometary
aspect of Venus raises the issue of the intense heat
we find on Venus. That intense heat is not well
explained at all by the idea that the planet is somehow
a twin of the Earth. It raises the distinct
possibility that Venus has had a far more dynamic history
than would have been taught. Comets and Catastrophe Our ancient ancestors were
obsessed with the comet. Let the slightest wisp of
a comet appear in the sky and all of humanity was
thrown into terror. But why was this? It was cosmic catastrophe that
inspired the ancient words and phrases for the comet. The comet was the torch of the sky,
the sword hanging over the world, the spiraling serpent or dragon,
the spiraling sidelock or ribbon, the angry or lamenting goddess
soaring across the sky, her hair disordered and
blowing in the wind. Anyone exploring the roots of the
ancient comet fears is going to run into the work of Immanuel
Velikovsky, the controversial theorist who suggested that there is a reason for
that fear of comets around the world. We experienced this horrific
cometary catastrophe. The world was devastated by a comet
just a few thousand years ago, and Velikovsky went further. He said that not long ago planets appeared
in the sky with comet-like attributes. In particular, he named the planet
Venus as the great comet of antiquity. Both Wal Thornhill and I disagreed with many
components of Velikovsky’s reconstruction but we also felt that Velikovsky
had nailed certain principles that can help us to understand
the early cultures. In particular, Velikovsky was correct in
naming the planet Venus as the great comet. And the cometary language
of Venus goes far beyond anything that
Velikovsky himself published. In every corner of the world,
the language of the comet and the language of
Venus are identical: Venus as serpent or dragon,
Venus as torch in the sky, Venus as long-haired star,
Venus as bearded star. The Sumerian goddess Innana
was identified as Venus. She was the lady of life
but in her terrible aspect she became a dragon-like
flame in the sky. The texts say: “Like a dragon you have
deposited venom on the land…”, “Raining the fanned fire
down upon the nation…” Innana became
a roaring storm, “With a roaring storm you roar…” she devastated the land. “Devastatrix of the Lands…” “Mankind comes before you in fear and
trembling at your tempestuous radiance…”, the texts say. Innana’s Babylonian counterpart
Ishtar was also identified as Venus. “She was the shining torch
of Heaven and Earth…”, “…furious and
irresistible onslaught…” “I rain down like flames…”,
the goddess announces. The Egyptian goddess Sekhmet
has the same attributes. She takes the form of
a fiery Uraeus serpent. She becomes “A flame of
fire in her tempest…”, “A star scattering
its flame in fire…” Sekhmet herself says: “The
fear of me is in their hearts…” and “The awe of me
is in their hearts…” “No one at all can approach
her…”, the Coffin Texts say. “The streams behind her
are flames of fire…” The astonishing fact is that
goddesses everywhere exhibit this terrifying
cometary aspect. The Canaanite Anat, the Hindu Kali
and Durga, the Greek Aphrodite, Athena, Medusa and
countless others. And, of course, you can add numerous
counterparts in the New World from the Incan goddess Chasca
to the Aztec goddess Xochiquetzal to the legendary Nokomis of
North American Indian tribes. The serpent or dragon is an
unexplained mystical archetype. There is nothing like it anywhere
in the biological world. And yet, the same recurring features will
be found in cultures the world over. The dragon’s disheveled
hair and shaggy beard its knotted aspect, and its world-wide appearances
as entwined twins, its fiery or lightning-like emanations,
and its effusive feathers. In all of the ancient serpent or
dragon images, it’s the luminous, filamentary, braided,
spiraling, metamorphosing and the destructive
aspect that stand out, the very traits of high
energy plasma discharge. The attributes of these mythic
monsters remain unexplained only until we see the hairy
and feathery attributes of the electric arc
in the laboratory. We see precisely the same thing in
enhanced images of the comet’s tail. And we see the same thing in the
comet-like discharges of distant nebulas. Gases in a vacuum
don’t behave this way but electrified plasma does. INTERSECT The recent discoveries about the
comet have astonished astronomers. Extreme ultraviolet light, X-rays, supersonic
jets, sharply etched surface relief, and cometary nuclei
fragmenting explosively, no one expected such
high energy events. The Electric Model proposes that
the comet is a charged object moving through an
electric field. This would explain
these phenomenon. But what is creating
the electric field? Suddenly everything changes and we are talking
about an electric Sun, electric stars and
electric cosmology and a whole new way of looking
at how the universe works. The End Dedicated to Amy
Acheson — 1946-2005

Namaste fellow Space Traveler✌I'm adding this to my 'Sleep Documentaries' playlist. If you're like me and want to listen to similar stuff while you fall asleep, go to my page because I'm making a playlist for people like us. No need to subscribe because I don't care for that but if you have a video that I should add to the playlist send me a link and I'll check it out. Thanks, press play, and goodnight!😴

I am wondering if the tests being done include plasma strikes into mineralized water? Would the produce large grained granite??

It seems to me that it would be better marketing/positioning if you stopped calling it "the standard model" and started calling it "the old model" or the "the old model that doesn't match observations" or "the legacy model" and started calling the electric model "the new model" or "the new electric model that does match observations." Positioning is important (look up Trout and Ries). The battlefield is not out in space; it is in the minds of the audience.

tingelingeling – information – tingelingeling – information – tingelingeling – information – tingelingeling – information –
reather boring and uninformative loss of time here.

These folks are making the same mistake as the gravity only people are making. Specifically, both groups are trying to explain everything based solely on their own theory and in fact, reality is a combination of both theories.

The electric universe is rubbish, fiction & lies, from what I can tell from credible people who are asked about it. I found at least one video of the electric universe designed for denial propaganda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN8x9A0S_sM&list=PL_uDcozosuk-FkBlVlDxLgQACpa0_p1Ru&index=40&t=2s

34:57

Doesn't trust computer simulations because they can only show what they've been programmed for.
Then
Uses computer simulations as evidence

Dafuq bro dafuq 🙂

Interesting video, but I have a few questions:

1) When traditional scientists plot the orbit of a spacecraft (or the orbit of an asteroid to predict whether it will impact Earth), they use the traditional gravitational model, yet somehow obtain extremely accurate results. What is the "electric universe" equivalent of orbital mechanics? Has anyone used it to plot the orbit of a comet or asteroid?

2) According to proponents of the electric universe, the sun isn't powered by nuclear fusion but is merely the focal point of electromagnetic currents, which are generated elsewhere in the universe. Okay, but what is the ultimate source of that power? Is it nuclear fusion or not? What is the proposed mechanism for fusion energy without stars?

Hmm…..In an Unlimited Universe “Everything is at the Centre!” You Are the Centre Of The Universe by default. The centre moves relevant to the Unlimited but remains the centre, so what are You?

This is nothing more than a cute cartoon. Filled with cartoon physics and lots of whiz bang sounds in the background. How would you explain a black hole with this theory, or dark matter and dark energy? Let me guess, it does not exist and forget the math behind this electric universe theory, there is none.

The gyro’s that are the electric engines making all this electricity must be the parts that are moving? Would be my guess.

COSMIC COWBOYS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AUA7XS0TvA I ALWAYS WONDERED WHAT HAPPENED TO DAVID TALBERT…. https://youtu.be/qFD7Ltn5TF8?t=19 HE WAS REPLACED BY MY FRIEND SKIPP BATTEN.

Interesting documentary evidences mrNelson1963 congratulations space exploration and more about planets constellations

“A force a thousand-billion-billon.” Oh my god. Where’s your measurement of this impossible amount? Check Puhlease.

17:50–Wouldn’t that be because he constructed it to be that way since it’s a computer program?

19:22–what took that image?

That’s because they were 👽 it’s the Singularity the Source in the Logos ps everything is energy an sounds vibrations etc

I have had the duty of protecting some of the best scientists we have and they are studying this closely. Further more they always have . Most just stick to E=Mc2.

Inaccuracies:
– Actually magnetic fields and electric currents are linked. A the fundamental level they are the same effect. There is no additional step of causality between the two.
– Causality can and has been broken. Quantum tunneling is one effect independent of causality.
– Comets are not rocks, also Philae lander did not explode. She is neatly chilling in the shade.

I could continue But this went into bullshit territory extremely fast.

This is total BS. I don't know what their game is but the models for neutron stars and black holes is very solid. The space plasma is so thin that it doesn't conduct electricity except in fairly dense areas like right next to the star. We also have a very detailed model of our sun and their crazy idea is the sun gets its energy from the galaxy. Incredible brain in navel explanation for everything.. This is not to say that there isn't a great deal of electromagnetic activity going on in the Sun because the Sun has a strong magnetic field.

The key sentence 3'00: "ONLY ELECTRIC CURRENTS CREATE MAGNETIC FIELDS" and powerful magnetic fields are measured EVERYWHERE in the universe. Amen.

According to the "Laws" of motion, etc. What force caused our planets to all circle the sun in the same direction? … what pushed (pulled?) the planets? … are we all just "circling the drain" in a gravity well? Or as in @13:00 and @17:25 ?

WHO IS ALMIGHTY ALLAH!
HE WHO CHALLENGED THE MANKIND
1400 YEARS AGO

" O company of jinn and men,if ye have
power to penetrate (all) regions of the
heavens and the earth,then penetrate
(them)!

Ye will never penetrate them save with
(Our) sanction".
(Qur'an,55:33)

Who can accept challenge of Almighty Allah.
Can NASA accept this challenge?

What if in the large scale gravity have some properties of the other fundamental forces? Kinda like light is just one part of the electromagnetic spectrum.

So, if only electric currents can produce magnet fields, does that mean a standard magnet has electric current flowing through it in one direction determined by the magnets structure? Does that mean electric current is continuously flowing through all matter? Does that mean that the Earth's core structure is like a spinning magnet creating a magnetic field because electric currents are flowing through it? I'm just trying to picture it.

If Quantum physics points to a Holographic Universe. It would stand to reason that it would be electrical. Can we ride the Currents? Can we change the Code?

wow the word science means reliability, myth now means fiction and not true !!! funny i seem to recall a shit load of are myths are becoming true LoL we dig them up every day. !!!

How many times have scientists in the past let us down? Our entire known universe is filled with opposites. Hot/cold, night/day, love/hate. But it goes well beyond into physics. I think we can all agree gravity is the strongest force we know of as humans. I believe gravity has an equal an opposite force. Dark energy, or Antigravity. Gravity itself takes more mass to become stronger. It only stands to reason that a very large area of space with zero mass, could produce its own force.  It's as simple as thinking of two containers linked at the bottom by a tube. If you fill one of these containers up with water, then the two will equalize as gravity pushes the water down. Antigravity, with the enormous absence of mass, has overpowered gravity and is ever accelerating the galaxies and stretching the space between them. we as humans are see to believe creatures. Humans are never in direct contact with this force at work. It's on such a huge scale between the opposing forces for us to even imagine it at work. We also don't live in an environment without mass, so we have never seen the force work first hand. Think of the oh so popular ball on a tarp analogy. Where the ball pulls the tarp down and represents gravity as it bends space time. On the edges of our known universe antigravity is so strong it pulls that tarp upwards. And puts a pulling affect on everything that gets closer. This would mean that the universe could actually slow down and become stable one day. Unless empty space never ends and we are torn to shreds. Only to await another bigbang

Science without spirituality can be very dangerous, you can see what is going on today on our Planet Earth! For better understanding of space you must research everything about NIKOLA TESLA!

MUY BUENA EXPLICACION PERO LO ESTAN ROMANDO DE ADENTRO HACÍA AFUERA(UNIVERSOIMAGINESE UN CUARTO TOTALMENTE OSCURO Y LO OSCURO(plasma) Q ES MUCHACONCENTRACION DE RNERGIA Y ESA ENERGIA EMITE LA LUZ FORMANDO LAS GALACIAS Y SOSTIENEN ENSENDIDA LA GALACIA Y SEGUN EL COLOR ASI MISMO ES SU FUNCION PARA ASI MANTENER LA FUCION Y FUSION DE TODO LO ILUMINADO
X ESO HAY Q ANALIZAR DE LO OSCURO A LO ILUMINADO
COLR AZUL ES DE CONTENER
COLR ROJO ES DE FUCION
DISCULPE SI NO PUEDO A DAR A INTENDER

Just dawned on me that you said it’s an electric world right and the scars on the planets could be like lighting arc weld type stuff could the explanation of it be from other intelligent species are mining different types or planets for different types of things? Does electricity and gold and platinum have any connections?
From my teachings all road don’t just lead to Rome it points to the sky no secret we could possibly be a race made to mine also ! Idk just thought I out this out there someone will read and let me know if I’m just thinking to much..

The Grand Canyon and the other planets you talk about with similar looking lands could have be struck by electricity by nature or it was directed to break up the ground to mine later!! I think it’s worth thinking about again.

And could there be a Ghost planet? A planet that was abandoned but floating around like a old pirate ship in the ocean ?

One of the best docs on cosmology….challenges the conventional model reasonably convincingly!…more importantly makes you question all that's been taught as fact in school & college…! That's why this is so invaluable!…everyone should see this!

This is my first view of this video. It point out all of the things that presents cosmology can't explained stating that what we observe fits with the electrical model. Maybe my scientific, and/or my english knowledge aren' sufficient but it seems to me that a lot of explanation is missing. They tried to explain everything within an hour from comet to the sun, sunspot, comet, eleptical galaxy, plsar, neutron star… There should be followup videos for each of the topics explaining the most often sentence in this video " this fit the electric model". While writing these comments Iam almost at the end of the video and I am under the impression that the producer. Are trying to get the electrical model as the theory of everithing. This documentary should have followup, but we have to look at it with an open mind.

Are any of these people familiar with the quest for the unified field theory? Einstein recognized the limitations of general and special relativity, you’re not presenting anything new with regards to the history of our understanding of gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. At least he’s given us a working theory that is actually capable of generating predictions that prove true time after time. What have you given, other than a couple poorly produced documentaries that the scientifically illiterate of YouTube like to share back and forth in-between their annunaki and cat vs. cucumber videos? Give us substance, not interviews with folklorists who have a profound misunderstanding of physics, if you want to be taken seriously.

Anything that spins, moves or rubs causes (consentrates?) electricity and opposite too, electricity changes or moves matter. Electricity rulez!

As hobbyist of cosmology, even I have thought the explanations under mainstream science in terms of the sun didn't seem to make sense. Like the examples pointed out in the video about sunspots and the surface of the sun being actually colder than the atmosphere or corona.
But, it seems like this electric universe theory and the videos so far that I have watched basically say gravity doesn't exist on any level. And I have heard repeated that the plasma model can scale. Which in the parts talked about in these videos make sense.
However, and perhaps there is a reason it hasn't showed up in any video so far, (maybe too basic or maybe can't be explained), but why is there is no explanation or talk about very simple, grounded, earthly examples of gravity such as an apple falling. How does the electric/plasma model explain these everyday human examples not in a laboratory?

GOD IS GRAVITY OR FOR THE HUMAN CALLED BLACK HOLE, THUNDER OR ELECTRICITY ARE CAME FROM THE FRICTION BETWEEN DUST AND BLACK HOLE ALSO,HYDROGEN ARE CAME FROM THE FRICTION ALSO THE WATTS AND HELLIUM

Do you think fish are aware they are in water and are swimming? Is our atmosphere made up.if a water type plasma that we unaware of like the fish might not?

let me guess, he's selling books and talking tour to raise money for more "study". I don't need a PhD to know that this is not science.

So promising the idea of an Electric Universe may be – this video turns out more as an obstacle than a catalyst to transport a scientific messages to science-interested public. All these purely speculative citations of ancient themes and especially the introduction of mythological schemes are just detrimental.

The arguments should be purely scientifical – no other crap without any relevance for cosmological science. Present your scientific ideas clean – present at least bold modells and theories why an Electric Universe is superior to the still prevailing gravitational mainstream in cosmology.
This video It a shame for all science-oriented people who long for an alternative cosmology on a real scientific base – as they see clearly the deficiencies of the current standard modell which are well supported by later findings in astronomy. For example: there is absolutlely no explanation in the standard modell for the "dipole repelller" recently discovered in the movements of galaxies in "our" galaxy cluster. Even Dark Matter oder Energy won't help out. That is the ground to work on – and not cave-drawings of some ancient aboriginies.

Slave to electricity when it should be free to all. Make it so. All this science and people are still paying through the nose for something which is in abundence. How sad.

All this babble, not backed up by an solid, experimental evidence or ANY mathematical models or formulas, all whilst ignoring a cornucopia of scientific evidence for nuclear fusion, creating a false dichotomy of "it's either electric or nuclear" which is sheer insanity, seeing how visible light is and possesses the properties of an electromagnetic wave, while itself being one of the by-products of nuclear fusion!! Primary electric universe model doesn't have a clue where all the heavier elements came from, or what is responsible for accelerating inflation, therefore it denies the Inflation, just as it denies other obvious things like General and Special Relativity despite the fact that they all use GPS in their cellphones, a coordinate system which could not possibly exist if General Relativity postulates were somehow "incorrect", because it relies on fine corrections for differences in passage of time which, as predicted by Einstein indeed differ based on point of reference, which was experimentally demonstrated for all to see decades ago!! It is a model which is built on guesses and hasn't made a single correct or useful prediction. It has failed miserably to show that gravity is "electrical" in nature, being a far weaker force than electromagnetism, it has failed to demonstrate "repulsive gravity" experimentally. It has failed to demonstrate the so called "galactic currents" which supposedly "feed the giant lamp of the Sun". Electric Universe DOESN'T HAVE A SINGLE PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATION ANYWHERE, didn't run a single experiment, didn't put forth a single TESTABLE hypothesis, did not attempt to address or falsify a single working scientific model in any degree of detail, or in other words EU did NOTHING which real science is all about!! It is sheer pseudoscience – employing a bunch of scientific jargon mixed in with gobbledegook , such as ancient creation myths, but it lies even in the latter instance!!! By far not all cultures have myths about there having been "other Suns" before the current Sun, very few indeed do, but they already know that, or they would have listed the cultures which have these myths SPECIFICALLY. If you people buy this load of horse manure, you are a thousand times dimmer than the frauds who peddle this junk in the first place. What a fucking swindle.

if you look at water exposed to frequencies it is the same thing as the wheel carving's each wheel has the same number of spokes as these frequencies and they spin so the spiral carving would make a lot of sense

Prove any structures seen in space are the result of electric or magnetic fields. You do realize that scientists are also aware of these type of fields, don't you? You also realize that electric charges seek their opposites and cancel out, don't you? The strength of the forces acting on cosmological structures has been measured, it is not a thousand, billion, billion, billion, billion, billion, times stronger than gravity. You guys need to find real jobs. You'll never get rich selling T-shirts on YouTube.

100 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Experiments In Sacred Geometry: Music Symbols
Articles
1
Experiments In Sacred Geometry: Music Symbols

Experiments In Sacred Geometry: Music Symbols FREE Meditation MP3: http://thespottydoggmethod.com Credits: Geometry Experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SFKiIkBy28 Sacred Crates-Passion Fruit (Lucid Skeems) http://sacredcrates.bandcamp.com/album/lucid-skeems Sonic Loom presents the 4th Orbita Solaris Sacred Sequence http://www.sonic-loom.com Shamanic Dimensions 1 ★( Psychedelic Sacred Geometry Visuals +fibonacci Dark Goa) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPduEiP0kzQ The Sacred Geometry in 3D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6lo7ce1_m8 Links- Website- …

What Is Grace? | Why Jesus Brought Grace To Save Us | The Power In The Blood Of Jesus
Articles
3
What Is Grace? | Why Jesus Brought Grace To Save Us | The Power In The Blood Of Jesus

in the previous episode we learn about the mission that Christ came to fulfill during his first coming to the world and that he executed only two objectives to rescue us from sin and hell and to set us free from the enemy’s bondage we learned specifically that he came …